Argumentative syntax is based on the intersection of “syntactic order” and “logical order of argumentation,” which achieves persuasive goals by regulating the connections between premises and conclusions. This study employs a descriptive-analytical method using library resources (authoritative commentaries, rhetoric and linguistics books). The novelty of this article lies in integrating “syntactic linguistics” and “Qur’anic anthropology.”This article analyzes three categories of syntactic structures: 1) summoning and address structures (vocative nidā’ and emphatic particles) for activating the audience’s prior identity; 2) command and obligation structures (imperative verbs and intensive forms) for internalizing action; 3) directing and standard-setting structures (adverbial qualifiers and absolute object) for establishing the criterion of correctness. The findings reveal that these structures yield a three-stage pattern of “identity summoning → action demand → criterion determination,” which recurs across all axes of the study. Furthermore, the relationship between syntax and human education in the Qur’an is explained at three levels: at the semantic level, syntactic structures carry obligation; at the procedural level, they move the audience from passive acceptance to responsible action; and at the teleological level, their ultimate goal is to cultivate a human being aligned with truth and justice (ḥaqq and qisṭ). Accordingly, the model of the “balanced human” integrates four domains: sustained justice-seeking, responsible dignity, transformative rationality, and systematic trusteeship. Thus, the argumentative syntax of the Qur’an is not merely a rhetorical method but a comprehensive educational program.syntax in formulating and representing the components of the balanced human being in the selected verses? 2) How do these functions reconstruct the identity, ethical, and social components of the balanced human being within the discursive structure?