Islamic Studies and Quranic Research in the Contemporary World

Islamic Studies and Quranic Research in the Contemporary World

Methodical Interdisciplinary Approach in Contemporary Islamic Hadith Studies: A Case Study of Social Network Analysis of Hadith Narrators in ʿIElal al-Sharayeeʿ

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Asisstant Professor of Qurʾān and Hadith Sciences, Faculty of Islamic Studies and Theology, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran
2 A PhD candidate of the study of religion in University of Religions and Denominations
Abstract
The proper and complete utilization of hadiths in alignment with the Holy Quran requires knowledge of various other disciplines, some of which have existed since the early centuries under the title of hadith sciences. The development of social needs, modern research methodologies, and new scientific questions in the present era have created opportunities for hadith scholars to incorporate not only traditional hadith sciences but also approaches and disciplines from other fields of the humanities into their studies. One effective approach to analyzing human relationships is Social Network Analysis (SNA).

To date, no systematic and comprehensive study based on social network analysis has been conducted on Shi'a sources to understand the role of early hadith narrators and the transmission of hadiths across generations. The present research examines the network of hadith narrators in the book ʿIElal al-Sharayeeʿ by analyzing its chain of transmission (isnād), leading to the construction of a narrators' social network. This narrative network was examined using social network analysis metrics at both macro and micro levels. At the macro level, factors such as density, clustering coefficient, and community structure were analyzed. At the micro level, metrics such as degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality were used.

Based on centrality measures, a list of influential figures-such as Muhammad ibn Abi Umayr Ziyad, Muhammad ibn al-Husayn ibn Abi al-Khattab, Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Khalid al-Barqi, Muhammad ibn Isa ibn Ubayd, and al-Hasan ibn Mahbub al-Sarrad- among the Companions (Ṣaḥāba) and hadith narrators were identified and ranked. Additionally, 26 communities within the transmission chains were discovered, and in each of these communities, key narrators who played a significant role in transmitting hadiths were identified.
Keywords
Subjects

  1. ابر نور، نرم‌افزار اسناد شیخ صدوق.
  2. ابر نور، نرم‌افزار درایه النور، نسخه 3.5.
  3. پاکتچی، احمد (1374 ش). ابن‌بابویه. دائرة‌المعارف بزرگ اسلامی، به کوشش موسوی بجنوردی، تهران: انتشارات دائرة‌المعارف بزرگ اسلامی.
  4. سربندی، مصطفی عبدالعلی (1401 ش). تحلیل تعامل شیخ صدوق با مشایخ اهل سنت؛ الگویی در جهت تقریب مذاهب اسلامی، تهران: دانشگاه امام صادق (ع).
  5. طوسی، محمد بن حسن (1351 ش). الفهرست. مشهد: دانشگاه مشهد، دانشکدۀ الهیات و معارف اسلامى.
  6. مدنی بجستانی، محمود (1385 ش). فرهنگ کتب حدیثی شیعه. تهران: شرکت چاپ و نشر بین‌الملل وابسته به موسسه انتشارات امیرکبیر.
  7. نجاشی، احمد بن علی (1404 ق). اختیار معرفة الرجال. قم: مؤسسة آل البیت (علیهم‌السلام) لإحیاء التراث.
  8. Ahmad, Mahammad Aurangzeb (2013) Towards the Analysis of Narrative Networks. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/215920.
  9. Alam, T., & Schneider, J. (2021). Social Network Analysis of Hadith Narrators from Sahih Bukhari.arXiv (Cornell University)https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2102.02009
  1. Alhajj, R., & Rokne, J. (2014).Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. Springer.
  2. Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th ed). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  3. Dini, S. K., Aidi, M. N., & Sartono, B. (2017). Social Network Analysis of Hadith Narrator (Case Study: Shahih Hadith of Imam Bukhari from Software Ensiklopedi Hadits Kitab 9 Imam).International Journal of Scientific & Enggineering Research,8, 176-181.‏
  4. Friedkin, N. E. and Johnsen, E. C. (2003). Attitude Change, Affect Control, and Expectation States in the Formation of Influence Networks. Advances in Group Processes, 20:1–29.
  5. Frodeman, R., Klein, J. T., & Pacheco, R. C. S. (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press.
  6. McCulloh, I., Armstrong, H., & Johnson, A. (2013).Social Network Analysis with Applications. John Wiley & Sons.
  7. McLevey, J., Scott, J., & JCarrington, P. (2024). The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. InSAGE Publications Ltd eBooks.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529614695
  8. Porter, M. A., Onnela, J., & Mucha, P. J. (2009). Communities in networks.arXiv (Cornell University).https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.0902.3788
  9. Repko, A. F. (2012). Interdisciplinary research: Process and Theory. SAGE Publications.
  10. Saeed, S., Yousuf, S., Khan, F., & Rajput, Q. (2021). Social network analysis of Hadith narrators. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 34(6), 3766–3774.
  11. Wetherell, C., Plakans, A., & Wellman, B. (1994). Social networks, kinship, and community in eastern Europe.The Journal of Interdisciplinary History,24(4), 639. https://doi.org/10.2307/205629
Volume 4, Issue 1 - Serial Number 7
August 2025
Pages 161-189

  • Receive Date 23 February 2025
  • Revise Date 19 May 2025
  • Accept Date 07 July 2025
  • First Publish Date 07 July 2025
  • Publish Date 23 August 2025